AIA Committee on Education for Architecture Spring 2016

 

pig.jpg

 

Sustainability on Any Budget

 

A tale of two states: Connecticut and Rhode Island achieve sustainable school design despite opposite economies.

By Glenn R. Gardiner, AIA, LEED AP, and Daniel Weston, AIA

A challenging economy is a catalyst for opportunity. Chicago Mayor and former White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel may have said it best, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

The Recession has prescribed stress tests for our public educational system, and municipalities across the nation are identifying schools’ strengths and weaknesses. Education decision makers in pre-K to 12 are focusing on design guidelines and building strategies that create compelling, functional, and innovative learning environments on a budget. Sustainability remains at the forefront of school design, and communities are quickly discovering that green not only protects the Earth, but also makes sound fiscal sense.

 

feat1.jpg

 

Lessons From Connecticut

Since 2007, Connecticut’s building code requirements have mandated that new school designs meet energy and sustainable standards. LEED Silver, CHPS, or NECHPS are most often utilized. From the onset there was significant resistance to sustainability goals, as municipalities believed mandates would increase costs and make taxpayers resistant. Initially, raw numbers were often taken out of context and applied only to short-term benefits. Over time, however, communities recognized the long-term cost savings associated with sustainable school design.

 

Renovate-as-New

Additionally, Connecticut has a unique reimbursable classification know as Renovate-as-New. Typically Connecticut does not reimburse school districts for work that would be classified as ordinary repair and maintenance. A renovation and addition project might be economically restricted in reimbursement to only those components that represent new program areas. Renovate-as-New requires design teams to certify that all building systems have an additional life span of 20 years.

“The State of Connecticut has many existing structures within its borders,” said Bruce Bockstael, chief architect and administrator of client teams for the Connecticut Department of Construction Services. “As far as the Department of Construction Services is concerned, we view this as a real blessing on several fronts. First, most buildings with 70 plus years of wear are still around due to the value of the construction techniques used in our past. They were built to last, used excellent materials, and were easily reusable. Secondly, real sustainable design is the project you don’t build. So, when faced with a space need where one can use an existing building, knowing that to build a new one requires energy to produce the materials, transport the materials, and the labor to put them in place, all of which represents an energy cost that we can avoid, then we simply update portions of an existing building to meet our technological needs for the day.”

 

District 18 Soars

Regional School District 18 in Lyme/Old Lyme, CT, demonstrates the success of the Renovate-as-New program and gained $4 million in reimbursements on a $40 million project. In 2006, District 18 and our firm, Northeast Collaborative Architects, embarked on a major renovation of their existing 30-year-old high school. As one of the first projects in Connecticut required to meet sustainability goals, it became an experimental model to explore ideas and cost impacts for meeting LEED Silver requirements. District 18 looked at the mandates for sustainable design coupled with the degree to which the building was being renovated and determined that it was in their best interest to pursue that reimbursement category.

Together we established a comprehensive program that balanced energy conservation, green product design, and long-term sustainability goals. The decision to reuse the existing facility made economic sense. Sustainability experts agree that building reuse often yields fewer environmental impacts than new construction. The reuse of buildings with an average level of energy performance consistently offers immediate climate change impact reductions compared to more energy-efficient new construction.

Beyond the initial savings associated with reusing the existing building, District 18 reaped additional benefits from implementing a geothermal system. Although the construction cost was increased by approximately $750,000, the geothermal system is expected to pay for itself within 10 years. The system has a 50-year life expectancy, so District 18 can anticipate 40 years of reduced energy costs associated with this decision. This, coupled with the myriad of additional energy-savings measures, such as daylight harvesting; LED site lighting; increased wall, window, and roof performance; and quality eco-friendly materials, will result in significant reductions in overall energy usage.

 

Rhode Island Rebounds

The Recession continues to resonate in neighboring Rhode Island where double-digit unemployment remains steadfast. Many cities and towns, especially low-income urban communities, are threatened by bankruptcy and do not have the resources to address problems plaguing their schools.

Prior to the economic downturn, Rhode Island’s public, private, and charter schools were advocating sustainable initiatives. For example, in 2007, our firm created a LEED Silver design for the expansion of the Compass School in South Kingstown, RI. In addition to maintaining high academic standards and strong family engagement, the charter school promotes environmental sustainability and social responsibility. The $9 million project featured learning clusters that would accommodate mixed classes comprised of three grade levels. Green elements harvest daylight and rainwater and include energy-efficient heating, cooling, lighting, and recycling and composting systems. In 2008, the Recession postponed the project but school leaders continue to raise building funds to achieve their original vision.

“Because of serious state and local budget concerns in Rhode Island, there is, at present, a moratorium on school construction and repairs except for those affecting health and safety,” said Elliot Krieger, spokesman for the Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

 

Hope Emerges
There is hope for the Ocean State, though. “Rhode Island is honored to be one of only six states to receive two Race to the Top awards, including the initial Race to the Top grant and the Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge grant,” added Krieger. “We are using these funds to transform education through ensuring educator excellence, adopting world-class standards and assessments, accelerating all schools toward greatness, and developing user-friendly data systems. Some of the initial work entails implementing a statewide evaluation system for educators, training more than 4,000 teachers in Common Core State Standards, providing mentoring for all beginning teachers, establishing an academy to train administrators who will work in the lowest-achieving schools, developing systems that will provide teachers with timely data on each of their students, and supporting the establishments and expansion of innovative charter public schools, among other initiatives.”

 

met.jpg

 

Striving for Innovation
Recognizing the connection between education and re-energizing the state’s sluggish economy, the Board of Regents recently approved new regulations on career-technical education that take dramatic steps to ensure all students have access to high-quality programs, and support the development and expansion of programs in fields that are likely to lead the way in the future of Rhode Island’s economy.

Innovative school models are key measures Rhode Island must embrace to create long-term progress for the public school. For example, the Metropolitan Regional Career and Technical Center is a state-funded public school district and local education agency that serves 690 high school students at three campuses. Our firm completed a feasibility study for the MET School’s campus in Newport, RI, which is presently in the schematic design phase led by the Rhode Island Department of Education.

According to its mission statement, “The MET’s individualized learning approach has proven successful in unlocking students’ passion for learning. The MET empowers its students to take charge of their learning, to become responsible citizens and life-long learners. The hallmarks of a MET education include internships, individual learning plans, advisory, and a breakthrough college transition program.”

Currently, the Rhode Island Department of Education, on behalf of the State of Rhode Island, is planning to build the first net-zero state facility and perhaps the first net-zero high school in the region. The project is designed to maximize renewable energy sources on the site and minimize energy consumption with an air-tight, well-insulated exterior envelope, 100-kW photovoltaic system, geothermal heat pump, and other sustainable features. The project will comply with the Rhode Island Department of School Construction Regulations and with the Northeast Collaborative for High Performance Schools’ protocol, and is intended to provide a model for school construction across Rhode Island and the region.

In Connecticut, Rhode Island, and school districts across the country, sustainability has become a priority. Voters are better educated as to the benefits of sustainability and expect school leaders and design professionals to fully understand all the opportunities that exist and the methodologies to incorporate them into their projects.

 


Daniel L. Weston, AIA, is a partner at Northeast Collaborative Architects. He focuses on the public school realm and was senior designer and project manager for over $150 million of educational projects in Connecticut. Reach him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">'+addy_text63639+'<\/a>'; //--> .

Glenn R. Gardiner, AIA, LEED AP, is a partner at Northeast Collaborative Architects. His career spans 30 years and he has developed an expertise in educational and sustainable design. Reach him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">'+addy_text37572+'<\/a>'; //--> .

Photo captions:

First photo - Connecticut Regional School District 18's new addition includes a secure administrative area as well as a new student commons/cafeteria that connects the two wings. (Credit: Northeast Collaborative Architects)

Second photo - The new MET School is a net-zero facility designed by Rhode Island Department of Education School Construction staff: Lead Architect Joseph da Silva; Architect Manuel Cordero, and Associate Mario Carreno.

PLACE Matters:  Creating Community in the Community College

The Connecticut Community College System taps into the power of adaptive reuse.

By Pamela J. Loeffelman, FAIA, LEED AP, and Lenell Kittlitz

The transformation of community colleges from an alternative degree program focused predominantly on certifying a specific area of training to the multifaceted approach of today offers a unique case study of how place matters—how learning environments both enable and inspire. Nowhere is this better illustrated than in the ongoing transformation of the State of Connecticut’s Community College System.

The original purpose of a community college was to provide education and workforce training that would fulfill the needs of the community within the geographic context of the school. When it opened its doors in 1946, the first Connecticut Engineering Institute was designed to meet the post-war needs of Connecticut’s manufacturers for competent technicians.

Mirroring national trends, Connecticut’s two-year college system expanded in the 1960s with three more technical institutes and nine community colleges. Place, while important, was predominantly decided by demographics and location. Acquisitions were often buildings not originally intended for higher-education use. This adaptive reuse led to a rich and varied architectural response by the Connecticut Community Colleges (CCC) to their specific regions, programs, and student populations.

 

Community Colleges Today

Today we continue to see tremendous expansion of the programs and constituencies that community colleges serve. CCC now enrolls 51.8 percent of undergraduate students in Connecticut public institutions of higher education, surpassing the Connecticut State University System and UConn.

The diversity of students is also increasing. From 1998 to 2001, part-time students generated more full-time equivalents (FTEs) than full-time students. This trend changed in 2002, and as of fall 2009, full-time students accounted for 57.7 percent of the total FTEs generated. Minority students represent 33.5 percent of the student body (30.1 percent are black and Hispanic), a 24.9 percent increase in minority enrollment since 2005. Overall, the community colleges enroll two thirds of the minority students in higher education in Connecticut.

While some students are still interested in two-year degree programs and short-term certificate programs, there are also those who are looking for solutions that reduce the cost of a four-year degree as well as those looking to change or advance their careers. In the fall of 2009, 43.9 percent of CCC students were enrolled in occupational programs. Liberal arts/general studies programs accounted for an additional 39.5 percent, with the remaining 16.6 percent not enrolled in a specific degree or certificate program. The most popular programs overall are liberal arts/general studies, business, and social/public services.

With this diversity of population and programs, the physical plant has had to adapt accordingly. Architecture has evolved from multipurpose classrooms to a more flexible high-tech learning environment. Labs are often industry driven and partially funded by companies looking to ensure access to appropriately trained workers.

In addition to academic spaces, the introduction of sophisticated community places has been an increasingly important component of campus development. These spaces support outreach, fundraising, and community development while also sustaining the social infrastructure for a very diverse student body.

Emerging development trends can serve to predict where future priorities will lie. Two case studies, one urban and one suburban, illustrate how the marriage of context, program, and character can shape a unique design for learning.

Housatonic Community College

During the 1990s, Housatonic Community College in Bridgeport relocated into the inner city by acquiring and transforming the abandoned Hi Ho Mall. Located directly adjacent to I-95, the site was also close to Metro North and other local transit routes and offered an attached parking garage. The new facility, known as Lafayette Hall, opened for the fall semester in 1997, with 180,000 gross square feet and 1,543 FTEs. Nine years later, Beacon Hall, a former department store within the mall, was renovated to increase campus space by 175,186 gross square feet, allowing for additional enrollment of 3,266 FTEs.

The primary design challenge was to adapt and transform the last element of an existing suburban mall. Originally a Sears, Roebuck, and Co., building, the vacated “big box” retail building needed to respond to a number of conflicting requirements:

  • One side of the building needed to respond to a 60-mph context and represent the city’s urban development, while the other side had to complete the frame of an academic quadrangle.
  • The existing Sears Building needed to be added into a single-building campus in such a way that the entire campus could be transformed.
  • The building had to be apportioned to accommodate the academic and social contexts that support the growing and diverse student body.
  • The renovated building required a layout that is adaptable as well as user friendly for a variety of demographics.

This recently completed project expanded Housatonic’s core capacity for state-of-the-art classrooms while also providing amenity space to create a campus setting that addressed the needs of part-time and full-time students. In addition to core

academic and faculty spaces, the newly programmed space includes a bookstore, wellness center, a black box theater, a cafeteria, and a large events space capable of multiple configurations that can host college and community programming for up to 500. In addition, art exhibition space was required to provide an appropriate venue for one of the largest art collections at any two-year college in the United States.

While the renovation of the existing Sears Building provided additional programs and capacities, the overall growth of the one building facility into a multi-building campus was pivotal in Housatonic’s continued development. The design for the courtyard brings students together by providing a community gathering place that encourages students to linger and interact before and after classes. It is this outdoor space that has transformed the campus and the overall student body’s social structure.

Manchester Community College

Manchester Community College, founded in 1963, is the largest community college within the system in terms of enrollment. Manchester also has the largest community college campus in the state at 160 acres. The college’s original 13 temporary buildings, known as the East Campus, were finally demolished in 2009 as part of the campus landscape master plan. Over the last decade, the college has grown to 470,000 gross square feet, allowing for a new learning resource center, culinary arts program, state-of-the-art classrooms, music rooms, art and graphics labs, science labs, and most recently the first middle college magnet school in the state of Connecticut, Great Path Academy.

This recent expansion was an addition that extended the existing core facilities and was intended to not only address enrollment but also increase Manchester’s core capacity for state-of-the-art classrooms while creating a campus setting that addresses the needs of both the part-time and full-time students. In addition to core academic and faculty spaces, the newly programmed spaces include a bookstore, wellness center, a 365-seat concert theater, a cyber café, and art exhibition space throughout public areas of the building.

Manchester has focused on a semicircular core circulation pattern with a central courtyard area, complete with gardens, outdoor space, and access to parking areas which fan out around the campus. The primary design challenge was to be as forward thinking and flexible in new space as possible, allowing for the escalating enrollment. Other key challenges included

  • Manchester needed to keep the intimacy of a small college while allowing for pedestrian and vehicle circulation and timely access to classrooms while not becoming a sea of asphalt.
  • Future building growth needed to be apportioned to accommodate the academic and social contexts that support the increasingly diverse student body. The former East Campus offers expansion opportunity for additional buildings and programs. It also provides the opportunity to continue to shape the Manchester campus into an institution that further nurtures not just the academic concerns of the students but also their need for social interaction with their peers.

 

Future Expansion

In recent years, economic pressures emphasized as never before the need to serve students by offering more appropriate and affordable pathways to education. Within the state of Connecticut, collaboration with other institutions of higher education resulted in the following initiatives:

  • The Connecticut State University System and the CCC system approved a transfer compact that offers dual admission to students who are planning to enroll at Central, Eastern, Southern, or Western Connecticut State Universities after completing an associate’s degree. Upon completion of the associate’s degree, students transfer to the university they have designated. The signing marked the first time that all 16 institutions adopted a uniform statewide dual admission program.
  • Graduates of Connecticut’s Community Colleges earning an associate’s degree in liberal arts with a 3.3 GPA were able to participate in a transfer program and be guaranteed admission to the University of Connecticut’s School of Business through an expansion of the Guaranteed Admissions Program. The Guaranteed Admissions Program (GAP), begun as a pilot program in 2004, provided Connecticut’s Community College students the opportunity for guaranteed admission to any UConn campus once they completed an associate’s degree in a liberal arts transfer program at any of the 12 Connecticut community colleges.
  • Graduates of the Connecticut Community College nursing program are now guaranteed admission to Saint Joseph College to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing. Students dually enrolled at the six community colleges that offer associate’s degrees in nursing will also have access to Saint Joseph’s faculty, resources, and advising.

As a result of these initiatives, enrollment has continued to substantially increase. In the spring 2010 semester, there were 55,030 students enrolled in the CCC system, up 9.2 percent from spring 2009. All 12 community colleges saw increases in headcount. Full-time equivalent enrollment around the system is 11.7 percent above spring 2009.

Just as in the past, the Connecticut Community Colleges, as well as similar institutions across the country that are experiencing the same level of growth, will answer this challenge as an opportunity to better serve students with appropriate curriculum and programs as well as architecture that can both inspire and enable. One apparent answer to the ever-changing demands of place is to recognize the return on investment of good design, which provides not only the needed response to program and function but also understands the value added of appropriate indoor-outdoor connections that assist students in transitioning to and from their already busy lives. Students in these spaces may be just a little more attuned to their immediate learning opportunities, which could ultimately lead to a new and improved future.

 


Pamela J. Loeffelman, FAIA, LEED AP, was principal in charge of the Housatonic Community College while she was the managing partner at Perkins Eastman’s Stamford, CT, office. She is a frequent lecturer, panel member, and juror on issues related to the advocacy of architecture for education, which can enable learning communities to be appropriately responsive to changing 21st century demands. Reach her at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">'+addy_text15662+'<\/a>'; //--> .

Lenell Kittlitz is director of facilities planning, Connecticut Community Colleges System. Reach her at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">'+addy_text91872+'<\/a>'; //--> .

 

Photo credit: Top: © Sarah Mechling-Perkins Eastman Below: © Elliot Kaufman

 

Volume 26/Fall 2017 

Check out the digital edition 
Review all Articles & 68 Award Winners:

Volume 26/Fall 2017 - Supplement

    CLICK ON IMAGE TO OPEN

FEB
26

6:00 pm 02.26.2018 - 7:00 pm 02.28.2018
4th Next Generation Learning Spaces

MAR
4

03.04.2018 - 12.06.2017
SCUP 2018 North Atlantic Regional Conference

MAR
11

03.11.2018 - 12.14.2017
SCUP 2018 Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference

APR
11

04.11.2018 - 12.14.2017
Association for Learning Environments Northeast Region (A4LE-NE)

NOV
7

11.07.2018 - 11.09.2018
EDspaces 2018

Visit the LEARNING BY DESIGN Buyer's Marketplace is a new resource spotlighting the most innovative companies and products in school design and construction.

For strategies on how to maximize your company’s reach to education design and construction market contact Alison Bashian (800.335.7500 x21).

The award-winning publication circulates three times a year to 50,000+ leaders and decision makers at all levels of education—from early childhood thru high schools to college and university-level institutions.

Contact Us

 For information about LEARNING BY DESIGN contact:

 216-896-9333

 mgoodman.lbd@gmail.com

Newsletter Signup